1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 4 Cal.App.3d
  5. 4 Cal.App.3d 204 (1970)
 

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE ETC. DIST. v. LUEHRING

Docket No. 26995.

4 Cal.App.3d 204 (1970)

84 Cal. Rptr. 291

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE AND HIGHWAY DISTRICT et al., Petitioners, v. DALE W. LUEHRING, as General Manager, etc., et al., Respondents; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

February 6, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Howard, Prim, Smith, Rice & Downs, Howard N. Nemerovski, Howard M. Downs, Stuart R. Pollak and Jerome B. Falk, Jr., for Petitioners.

Jerome B. White and Albert M. Monaco for Respondents.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, Thomas J. Blanchard, Chief Deputy City Attorney, and Robert A. Kenealey, Deputy City Attorney, for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

CHRISTIAN, J.

The Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District and its directors seek mandate to compel the general manager and auditor of the district to issue warrants for payment of certain surplus revenues of the district to the county governments of the counties comprised within the district. (1a) We have concluded that the proposed payments, although purportedly authorized by Statute of 1968, chapter 1366, would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases