1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 111 N.J.
  5. 111 N.J. Super. 67 (1970)
 

KENT, ET AL. v. BOROUGH OF MENDHAM ET AL.,

111 N.J. Super. 67 (1970)

267 A.2d 73

HERBERT E. KENT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE BOROUGH OF MENDHAM, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 9, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward Sachar argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Sachar, Sachar & Bernstein, attorneys; Mr. Norman Schulaner, on the brief).

Mr. Thomas L. Morrissey argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys; Mr. Robert E Turtz, on the brief).

Before Judges KILKENNY, LABRECQUE and LEONARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of and denial of their motion to amend their complaint challenging certain zoning ordinances of the Borough of Mendham (hereafter the borough).

The borough is a residential community located some seven miles west of Morristown and bisected by State Highway Route 24. Situated in a hilly rural area, it is surrounded on three sides by the Township of Mendham (hereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases