1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 46 Wis.2d
  5. 46 Wis.2d 130 (1970)
 

TUSCHEL v. HAASCH

No. 76.

46 Wis.2d 130 (1970)

174 N.W.2d 497

TUSCHEL (Leon, Sr.), Special Administrator of the Estate of Leon Tuschel, Jr., Respondent, v. HAASCH and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 3, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Staub & Lemke, attorneys, and John A. Hamell, Jr., of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Hamell.

For the respondent there was a brief by Sabrowsky, Raasch, Reidenbach & Miller and Gerard B. Skibinski, attorneys, and Stephen R. Miller of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Stephen R. Miller.

HANLEY, J.

The issues raised by this appeal and cross appeal are:

(1) Did the trial court sufficiently state its reasons for granting a new trial as is required by sec. 270.49 (2), Stats.;

(2) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in granting a new trial; and

(3) Did the trial court err in not changing answers in the special verdict as requested by the plaintiff?

Sufficiency of Expression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases