NOSSEN v. UNITED STATES

No. 350-61.

422 F.2d 1340 (1970)

Ernest Samuel NOSSEN and E. S. Nossen Laboratories, Inc. v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

March 20, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Toren, New York City, atty. of record, for plaintiffs. McGlew & Toren, New York City, of counsel.

Martin Avin, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen., William D. Ruckelshaus, for defendant. Roland A. Anderson and John A. Horan, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and LARAMORE, DURFEE, DAVIS, COLLINS, SKELTON and NICHOLS, Judges.


ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Following the decision of this court, 416 F.2d 1362, 189 Ct.Cl. 1, (1969), that the patent claims were invalid and that the suit under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1964) must be dismissed, the plaintiffs have made a timely motion for rehearing under Rule 151. The motion must be and is denied for the reasons that follow:

Our conclusion that the claims were invalid rested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases