SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER ONE OF PIMA CTY. v. HASTINGS

No. 2 CA-CIV 741.

12 Ariz. App. 164 (1970)

468 P.2d 615

SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER ONE OF PIMA COUNTY, Arizona, Appellant, v. Russell HASTINGS, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Review Granted June 2, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose S. Silver, County Atty., Pima County, Lawrence Ollason, Sp. Deputy County Atty., Tucson, for appellant.

Miller, Pitt & Feldman, Tucson, for appellee.


Review Granted June 2, 1970. Opinion Withdrawn.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The court having considered the motion for a rehearing, concludes that it be denied for the reasons herein set forth.

The agreement between the parties dated January 17, 1966, sets forth the method by which the architect was to be compensated. It states in paragraph B that "[t]he Owner agrees to pay the Architect * * * a fee not to exceed six (6)

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases