Per Curiam.
Relator first contends that the Court of Appeals could not "treat a motion to dismiss * * * as if it were a motion for a directed verdict." Since there would be no jury in a case such as this, we assume that relator has confused a motion for a directed verdict with a motion for judgment. We see no possible reason why the Court of Appeals could not treat a motion to dismiss at the close of the relator's case as a motion for judgment.
Relator...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
