McFADDEN v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM, LOCAL BOARD 40

No. 23591.

423 F.2d 1291 (1970)

James F. McFADDEN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM, LOCAL BOARD 40, et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 12, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Harrington (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jerry K. Cimmet (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Ephraim Margolin, San Francisco, Cal., Duane, Morris & Hecksher, Philadephia, Pa., Johnston, Platt, Klein & Horton, Oakland, Cal., amicus curiae.

Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

It is the court's view that McFadden, a registrant, is not entitled to a three-judge district court trial run on his constitutional views as to his draft classification. This is based on our reading of Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114, 66 S.Ct. 423, 90 L.Ed. 567; Oestereich v. Selective Service Board, 393 U.S. 233, 89 S.Ct. 414, 21 L.Ed.2d 402; and Clark v. Gabriel, 393...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases