1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 24 Ohio
  5. 24 Ohio St. 2d 143 (1970)
 

IN RE KLAUSMEYER

No. 70-730.

24 Ohio St. 2d 143 (1970)

IN RE KLAUSMEYER ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 16, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Beirne, Wirthlin & Manley, Mr. John S. Wirthlin, Messrs. McCaslin, Imbus & McCaslin and Mr. Clement J. DeMichelis, for petitioners.

Mr. Melvin G. Rueger. prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Arthur M. Ney, for respondent, Dan Tehan, Sheriff of Hamilton County.

STERN, J.

There are two issues presented in this case. The first is whether the information sought by the grand jury must be disclosed to that body. The second is whether such a disclosure constitutes a violation of Rule XVIII(20) of the Rules of Practice of this court.

The requirement of privacy in Rule XVIII(20) was intended to protect the attorney whose reputation is in issue in inquiry proceedings. The secrecy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases