GSELL v. DUMBECK

No. 25555.

431 F.2d 1204 (1970)

William Earl GSELL, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. C. A. DUMBECK, Defendant and Appellant. John N. Adams, III and Donald A. Rowberry, Defendants and Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 30, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don Willner (argued) of Willner, Bennett & Leonard, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Thomas A. Huffman (argued) of Huffman & Zenger, Hillsboro, Or., Duane A. Bartsch of Smart & Bartsch, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before WRIGHT and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

In a non-jury trial, an able and experienced trial judge found the defendants guilty of fraudulent misrepresentations and entered judgment against all defendants. Although defendant Adams was the ringleader, there is little doubt that appellant Dumbeck actively participated in the overall plan. Only Dumbeck appeals.

We affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the opinion and findings of the trial judge. Gsell v. Adams, Dumbeck & Rowberry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases