1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 433 F.2d
  5. 433 F.2d 1034 (1970)
 

CARTER-WALLACE, INC. v. RIVERTON LABORATORIES, INC.

No. 43, Docket 34718.

433 F.2d 1034 (1970)

CARTER-WALLACE, INC., Appellee, v. RIVERTON LABORATORIES, INC., Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided November 9, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zachary T. Wobensmith, 2nd, Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis C. Jones, Jones, Jenkins & Warden, Brooklyn, N. Y., and Zachary T. Wobensmith, 3rd, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

William D. Denson, New York City (Morgan, Finnegan, Durham & Pine, George B. Finnegan, Jr., and John D. Foley, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and WEINFELD, District Judge.

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from the district court's determination that the patent of the appellee, Carter-Wallace, Inc., for a certain pharmaceutical compound, generically known as meprobamate, was valid, and, as the appellant, Riverton Laboratories, Inc., had conceded infringement, that Carter-Wallace was entitled to injective relief, an accounting and damages.1 We affirm.

United States Letters Patent No. 2,724...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases