CITY OF DAYTON v. HILL

Nos. 69-121 and 69-122.

21 Ohio St. 2d 125 (1970)

CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLANT, v. HILL, APPELLEE. CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLANT, v. SMITH, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 25, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lee C. Falke, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. John E. Breidenbach, for appellant.

Messrs. Goldman, Bogin & Fox, and Mr. W. I. Shaman, for appellees.


HERBERT, J.

At the outset, it should be noted that the allegation of denial of counsel (and the admission thereof for purposes of the demurrer) removes from these cases the question of res judicata, decided in State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 175, 226 N.E.2d 104. It is also clear that the offense with which appellees were charged was such that they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases