1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 56 N.J.
  5. 56 N.J. 89 (1970)
 

STATE v. ROSEN

56 N.J. 89 (1970)

265 A.2d 142

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACOB ROSEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 4, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis Lipschitz, of the Philadelphia bar, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William S. Keown, on the brief; Messrs. Keown and Daniels, attorneys).

Mr. Alfred M. Bitting, Assistant Burlington County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Maurice Denbo, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief; Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

There having been a dissent in the Appellate Division, defendant appealed to us as of right. R. 2:2-1(a). The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in its majority opinion. 110 N.J.Super. 216 (App. Div. 1969).

Defendant was ably represented by experienced counsel. His unparticularized allegation that counsel was ineffective is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases