1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 463 P.2d
  5. 463 P.2d 875 (1970)
 

BEAGLE v. RUDIE WILHELM WAREHOUSE COMPANY

463 P.2d 875 (1970)

In the matter of the Compensation of John H. BEAGLE. John H. Beagle, Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. RUDIE WILHELM WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Inc., Dba Wilhelm Trucking Company, Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided January 15, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter H. Sweek, Portland, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Vergeer, Samuels, Roehr & Sweek, Portland.

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison, and Richard P. Noble, Portland.

FORT, Judge.

This appeal and cross-appeal from an award of compensation presents two questions. The first, raised by appellant employer only, is a challenge to the method used in the circuit court in the admission of evidence under ORS 656.298(6), and the second, raised by both parties, challenges the disability award made by the court, by the Hearing Officer, and by the Board.

Claimant had sought an award for permanent total disability which was denied by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases