CLAIROL, INC. v. KINGSLEY


109 N.J. Super. 22 (1970)

262 A.2d 213

CLAIROL, INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM KINGSLEY, ACTING DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 16, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Roger C. Ward argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys).

Mr. Charles H. Landesman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLOVSKY, J.A.D.

Clairol, Incorporated, is a Delaware corporation which has not qualified to do business in New Jersey. It appealed to the Division of Tax Appeals from the denial by the Director of the Division of Taxation of Clairol's claims for refund of the following taxes (besides interest) paid under protest for the years 1959 to 1963 inclusive:

1959 .........

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases