The STATE OF MINNESOTA, The State of North Dakota, State of South Dakota et al., and State of Wisconsin,
v.
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION; Paper, Calmenson & Co.; St. Paul Foundry & Manufacturing Co. (now The Maxson Corporation); St. Paul Structural Steel Company; Crown Iron Works Company; The Hustad Company.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 27, 1970.
January 27, 1970.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Erickson, Popham, Haik & Schnobrich by Wayne G. Popham and Bruce D. Willis, Minneapolis, Minn., and Roger E. Montgomery, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul Minn., for plaintiff State of Minnesota.
Erickson, Popham, Haik & Schnobrich by Wayne G. Popham, Minneapolis, Minn., together with Robert A. Alphson, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Grand Forks, N. D., for plaintiff State of North Dakota.
Erickson, Popham, Haik & Schnobrich by Wayne G. Popham, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff State of South Dakota.
Theodore L. Priebe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, Wis., for plaintiff State of Wisconsin.
Dominic B. King, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant United States Steel Corp.
Doherty, Rumble & Butler, by Frank M. Clayborne, St. Paul, Minn., for defendant Paper, Calmenson & Co.
Moore, Costello & Hart, by Robert A. Albrecht, St. Paul, Minn., for defendant The Maxson Corp.
Fredrikson, Byron & Colborn, by Jerome B. Pederson, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant St. Paul Structural Steel Co.
Oscar A. Brecke, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant Crown Iron Works.
Warner, Ratelle, Hennessy, Vander-Vort & Stasel, by Frank J. Warner, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant The Hustad Co.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.
NEVILLE, District Judge.
Before the court for a ruling are defendants' motions (1) for a partial interlocutory summary judgment in their favor; (2) for an amendment of certain portions of this court's order and memorandum opinion of May 15, 1969, found in State of Minnesota v. United States Steel Corporation, 299 F.Supp. 596 (D.Minn.1969); and (3) for a certificate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) permitting defendants to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
