UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL FWDG. COMPANY

A.R.D. 270; Reappraisement R60/2082 and four others.

311 F.Supp. 956 (1970)

UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL FWDG. COMPANY et al., Appellees.

United States Customs Court, Second Division, Appellate Term.

April 7, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Glenn E. Harris, New York City, trial atty.), for appellant.

Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, New York City (Joseph F. Donohue, New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before RAO, Chief Judge, and FORD and NEWMAN, Judges.


RAO, Chief Judge.

This application for review again brings before the court the question of the propriety of appraisements based on the so-called "MITI" or "check" prices.

Basically, the facts are as follows: The imported merchandise, binoculars, could not be exported from Japan without an export license issued by the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), an administrative agency of the Japanese Government. MITI would not approve an application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases