1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 474 P.2d
  5. 474 P.2d 778 (1970)
 

STATE v. HOWELL

474 P.2d 778 (1970)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Douglas Artimus HOWELL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided October 2, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth W. Stodd, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent; with him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and BRANCHFIELD, JJ.

BRANCHFIELD, Judge.

Upon trial by jury the defendant was found guilty of armed robbery. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence (1) testimony by a police officer concerning currency found in the defendant's pocket at the time of the defendant's arrest, and (2) testimony by a police officer that the defendant had admitted to being a narcotics addict.

A robber held up a drugstore at gunpoint at approximately 8:00 p.m. on February 14...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases