PER CURIAM.
In 1960 defendant and a codefendant, Carroll Lay, were tried jointly for robbery armed, CLS 1961, § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 28.797). Out-of-court statements by Lay which implicated the defendant were admitted over objection by the defense counsel. The trial court properly charged the jury that it could not consider such statements as evidence against Hood. Lay was acquitted, but the defendant was convicted and sentenced to a term of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
