1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 21 Ohio
  5. 21 Ohio St. 2d 94 (1970)
 

ROSE v. HASKINS

No. 69-503.

21 Ohio St. 2d 94 (1970)

ROSE v. HASKINS, SUPT., LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 4, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herbert E. Rose, in propria persona.

Mr. Paul W. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. James S. Rood, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

It is well established in Ohio law that parole is a matter of grace. While parole is a release from confinement, the parolee is still in the legal custody of the Department of Mental Hygiene and Correction. In re Varner, 166 Ohio St. 340. See, also, State, ex rel. London, v. Pardon and Parole Comm., 2 Ohio St.2d 224; Barnhard v. Maxwell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases