The sole argument advanced by appellant on this appeal is that the cross-examination of one of his witnesses by respondent's counsel constituted prejudicial conduct requiring a new trial. Concededly, testimony as to a settlement or offer of settlement by a witness or party is inadmissible (Brown v. Schneider,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.