The record amply supports the trial court's determination that appellant is mentally ill. The trial court did not have to accept the testimony of appellant's psychiatrist rather than the testimony of the three qualified physicians who testified for the State. Section 383 of the Correction Law does not mandate that the examining physicians be practicing psychiatrists. Nor does United States ex rel. Schuster v. Herold (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. GOLINDES
33 A.D.2d 1077 (1970)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Golindes. Also Known as David Galindes, Also Known as David Galindez, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 20, 1970
February 20, 1970
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
