KING v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.

No. ED 69-C-35.

313 F.Supp. 784 (1970)

Carl KING, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and Fordyce & Princeton Railroad Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division.

June 11, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. M. Herndon, Herndon & Patterson, North Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiff.

William R. Overton, Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, Little Rock, Ark., for Chicago, Rock Island and Pac. RR. Co.

Norwood Phillips, Shackleford & Shackleford, El Dorado, Ark., for Fordyce & Princeton RR. Co.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

OREN HARRIS, Chief Judge.

In this case the defendants, Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company and Fordyce & Princeton Railroad Company, have filed separate motions for summary judgment contending there is no genuine issue of fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law, in that the terms and provisions of the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., do not apply. The defendant, Fordyce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases