Judgment affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner's application for an area variance was denied by the board on the ground that the granting thereof would be detrimental to the "public health, safety and welfare". In our opinion, that conclusion is not supported by substantial evidence; hence, the Board's determination cannot stand. The board found that "the dimensions of the plot are not normal for this area thereby affecting the light and air", despite the facts that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.