Order affirmed, without costs.
The record established that respondent was employed at night at a department store; that petitioner had harassed him at the store by coming there ostensibly to shop but actually to question other employees about him; that she came to the store more often than was necessary for her shopping and remained there longer than necessary; and that she also made frequent telephone calls to him at the store. On this showing, the Family Court issued...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
