1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 428 F.2d
  5. 428 F.2d 639 (1970)
 

SUTTER PRODUCTS CO. v. PETTIBONE MULLIKEN CORP.

No. 17806.

428 F.2d 639 (1970)

SUTTER PRODUCTS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PETTIBONE MULLIKEN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

June 5, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lloyd M. Forster, Farley, Forster & Farley, Detroit, Mich., Arlie O. Boswell, Jr., Hibben, Noyes & Bicknell, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.

Norman H. Gerlach, Chicago, Ill., Louis Robertson, Darbo, Robertson & Vandenburgh, Arlington Heights, Ill., for defendant-appellee.

Before CUMMINGS and KERNER, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, District Judge.

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Sutter Products Company manufactures foundry equipment in Holly, Michigan. It charges that the Flexiblomatic machines manufactured by Pettibone Mulliken Corporation's Beardsley & Piper Division in Chicago, Illinois, infringe the apparatus claim of Sutter Patent No. 2,856,653. Plaintiff also asserts infringement of apparatus claim 3 of Sutter Patent No. 2,867,017 by another of defendant's machines which removes finished articles...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases