CURRIERI v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE

Docket No. 12345.

4 Cal.App.3d 997 (1970)

84 Cal. Rptr. 615

MICHAEL A. CURRIERI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 27, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Lawrence K. Karlton for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Robert J. Trombley for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

PIERCE, P.J.

Petitioners are two policemen who were discharged by the City of Roseville. They petitioned for reinstatement and back pay, contending their discharge was illegal since they were permanent (as distinct from probationary) employees who were discharged without a hearing. The city argued that petitioners were still probationary employees and as such subject to summary discharge. Petitioners appeal from the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases