1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 44 Wis.2d
  5. 44 Wis.2d 55 (1969)
 

STATE v. BYLSMA

No. State 50.

44 Wis.2d 55 (1969)

170 N.W.2d 707

STATE, Plaintiff, v. BYLSMA, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided September 30, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff there was a brief and oral argument by Rudolph P. Regez of Monroe, counsel for the Board of State Bar Commissioners.

For the defendant there was oral argument by Jack McManus of Madison.

PER CURIAM.

The sole question before us is what discipline is to be imposed in this disciplinary proceeding. No challenge is raised by the defendant to the finding of the referee that the defendant was guilty of unprofessional conduct. In fact, no challenge is made by the defendant to the recommendation of the referee as to the appropriate or indicated discipline. It is the complainant Board of State Bar Commissioners that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases