1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 250 A.2d
  5. 250 A.2d 739 (1969)
 

MARKUS & NOCKA v. JULIAN GOODRICH ARCHITECTS, INC.

No. 318.

250 A.2d 739 (1969)

MARKUS & NOCKA v. JULIAN GOODRICH ARCHITECTS, INC., and Julian Goodrich.

Supreme Court of Vermont. Chittenden.

January 9, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Yandell & Page, Burlington, for plaintiff.

Donald E. O'Brien, Burlington, for defendant.

Before HOLDEN, C. J., and SHANGRAW, BARNEY, SMITH and KEYSER, JJ.

BARNEY, Justice.

The defendant Goodrich claims that the lower court assessed architect's fees against him in favor of the plaintiff, without passing on his motion in bar of such a recovery. This motion is not classified a dilatory plea subject to the requirements of 12 V.S.A. § 1034, but it is an affirmative matter which the defendant had the burden of advancing and establishing under 12 V. S.A. § 1024. Other issues are also raised by this appeal, by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases