REED v. REED

No. 42026.

456 P.2d 529 (1969)

Mamie REED, Plaintiff in Error, v. Harry C. REED, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 24, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ivester, Ivester & Ivester, Sayre, for plaintiff in error.

Carl A. Rizley, Sayre, for defendant in error.


DAVISON, Justice.

Mamie Reed (defendant below) appeals from a divorce decree rendered in the trial court, complaining that the lower court erred in its determination of the length of her marriage with Harry C. Reed (plaintiff below) and erred in the division made of the jointly acquired property between the parties. She also complains there was error in not awarding her alimony, and in not allowing sufficient attorney fee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases