VAN CLEEF & ARPELS, INC. v. SCHECHTER

No. 65 Civil 1823.

308 F.Supp. 674 (1969)

VAN CLEEF & ARPELS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Stanley SCHECHTER and Jerome Grossbardt, individually and as partners, doing business under the firm name and style of Honora Jewelry Company, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 31, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keesing & Layton, New York City, for plaintiff, Charles D. Monto, New York City, of counsel.

Friedman & Goodman, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendants, Abraham Friedman, Abraham Goodman, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel.


OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

LEVET, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Van Cleef & Arpels, Inc. (Van Cleef), alleging infringement of a copyright on a jewelled clip and unfair competition, brings suit against defendants, Stanley Schechter and Jerome Grossbardt in their individual capacities and as partners doing business under the name Honora Jewelry Company. The defendants counterclaim for a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases