FRISCHMAN v. FRISCHMAN


31 A.D.2d 938 (1969)

Seymour Frischman, Respondent, v. Annette Frischman, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 10, 1969


In our opinion, discretion was not abused by the denial of the motion. The obligations of plaintiff to defendant would be better resolved by Special Term at one time rather than in piecemeal fashion. As defendant has elected to reserve to her answer those issues involving plaintiff's right to a divorce pursuant to subdivision (5) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law by virtue of the New Jersey judgment, we do not pass upon any of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases