1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 275 Cal.App.2d
  5. 275 Cal.App.2d 681 (1969)
 

ESTRADA v. DARLING-CROSE MACHINE CO.

Docket No. 25509.

275 Cal.App.2d 681 (1969)

80 Cal. Rptr. 266

RICHARD ESTRADA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DARLING-CROSE MACHINE COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

August 19, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard, Prim, Smith, Rice & Downs, Henry W. Howard, Howard M. Downs, and Stuart R. Pollak for Defendant and Appellant.

J.W. Ehrlich and Edward F. Dullea for Plaintiff and Respondent.

TAYLOR, J.

Defendant, Darling-Crose Machine Company, appeals from a money judgment in favor of plaintiff, Richard Estrada, contending that the court erroneously applied the parol evidence rule to exclude evidence of custom.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendant is a distributor of machine tools for whom plaintiff acted as a sales engineer or sales representative between mid-1963 and December 31, 1965. On or about July 1, 1963, plaintiff and defendant entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases