1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 269 Cal.App.2d
  5. 269 Cal.App.2d 675 (1969)
 

HOLMES v. STEELE

Docket No. 32578.

269 Cal.App.2d 675 (1969)

75 Cal. Rptr. 216

DAVID M. HOLMES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JACK STEELE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 14, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mack, Nast & Boss and Leo Mack, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

FORD, P.J.

The defendants Steele have appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for recovery of $2,000, together with interest thereon from December 21, 1965.1 No brief has been filed on this appeal by the plaintiff.

Portions of the settled statement (rule 7, Cal. Rules of Court) are as follows: "On or about September 10, 1965, defendant Clifford J. Emmich, Jr., as `Seller', and plaintiff, as `Buyer', entered into a written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases