HEMPHILL v. SIMMONS

44657.

120 Ga. App. 823 (1969)

172 S.E.2d 178

HEMPHILL v. SIMMONS.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided December 16, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCamy, Minor, Phillips & Tuggle, Carlton McCamy, for appellant.

Spence & Milam, Herman J. Spence, Robert K. Ballew, for appellee.


QUILLIAN, Judge.

1. The main basis on which the defendant predicates his contention that the direction of the verdict was correct is that the evidence failed to show that the plaintiff had any title or right of action on the note in question. With this contention we cannot agree.

It is true that in order to sustain an action on a promissory note payable to the order of a third party it must be affirmatively shown: "that the note has been transferred to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases