SCHNELL v. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF OREGON


451 P.2d 484 (1969)

Dorothy SCHNELL, Respondent, v. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF OREGON, an Oregon Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided March 12, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin J. Peterson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Paul R. Duden and Tooze, Powers, Kerr, Tooze & Peterson, Portland.

Dwight L. Schwab, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Frank H. Hilton, Jr., and Hutchinson, Schwab & Burdick, Portland, and David B. Williamson and Williamson & Whipple, St. Helens.

Before PERRY, C.J., and SLOAN, GOODWIN, HOLMAN, and MENGLER, JJ.


GOODWIN, Justice.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for damages for injuries sustained when she was knocked down in the defendant's store. The defendant appeals.

The store, known as the "As Is Store," is an outlet for a variety of articles of donated, used, factory-defective, and other merchandise sold at bargain prices without warranty of quality. The store attracts a hardy band of customers, many of whom are themselves operators of second-hand stores. During...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases