1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 253 Md.
  5. 253 Md. 679 (1969)
 

CROUSE v. HAGEDORN

[No. 231, September Term, 1968.]

253 Md. 679 (1969)

253 A.2d 834

CROUSE, ET AL. v. HAGEDORN

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 30, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin H. Miller (on both arguments), with whom were Miller, Miller & Kuczynski on the brief, for appellants.

Daniel W. Moylan and John H. Urner (on first argument), with whom were Bushong, Byron, Moylan & Urner on the brief. Reargued by Daniel W. Moylan, for appellee.

The cause was argued on April 8, 1969 before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SMITH, JJ. and reargued on April 28, 1969 before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. McWILLIAMS, J. dissents.

This case grows out of an accident near Hancock in Washington County. Appellant (Crouse) was the plaintiff in the Circuit Court for Washington County. Appellee (Hagedorn) was the defendant. After trial before a jury on which issues were submitted a judgment was entered in favor of Hagedorn. Motion was made by Crouse for judgment n.o.v. or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases