Order, entered August 27, 1968, affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to plaintiffs-respondents.
There is no merit whatever in the defendant's argument, persistently adhered to in its reply brief, that the renewal application was improperly considered by a Justice other than Mr. Justice LYMAN, who decided the original motion. The defendant knew or should have known of the illness of Mr. Justice LYMAN and time of this court has been wasted in the consideration...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
