1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 452 P.2d
  5. 452 P.2d 457 (1969)
 

MATUSIK v. LARGE

No. 5619.

452 P.2d 457 (1969)

Andrew L. MATUSIK, Appellant, v. A.O. LARGE and Billie Pearl Large, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

April 3, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel R. Walsh, Carson City, for appellant.

Roland W. Belanger, Lovelock, for respondents.

OPINION

MOWBRAY, Justice.

The principal issue presented for our consideration on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to set aside a sale of a truck-mounted well-drilling rig purchased by the respondents, A.O. Large and Billie Pearl Large, from C.C. Davidson, now deceased. The appellant, Andrew L. Matusik, claims that the sale was a conveyance of Davidson's assets made to defraud his creditors.

1. The Matusik-Davidson Litigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases