1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 255 Md.
  5. 255 Md. 651 (1969)
 

HARTMAN v. CADDINGTON

[No. 106, September Term, 1969.]

255 Md. 651 (1969)

258 A.2d 740

HARTMAN ET AL. v. CADDINGTON

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 20, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Bullard for appellants.

Frank W. Wilson for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, FINAN, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The appeal must be dismissed because there was no final judgment below from which an appeal could be taken. After a jury verdict, appellants filed a motion for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative a new trial and the trial court granted a new trial.

Appeal dismissed with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases