1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 45 Wis.2d
  5. 45 Wis.2d 44 (1969)
 

WILLIAMS v. STATE

No. State 77.

45 Wis.2d 44 (1969)

172 N.W.2d 31

WILLIAMS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 25, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by James D. MacDonald, attorney, and Eugene W. Lenartz and Brown & Lenartz of counsel, all of Union Grove, and oral argument by Mr. MacDonald.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Gerald E. Clickner, district attorney of Racine county.

CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

The issues presented on review are: (1) Is there sufficient credible evidence to support the verdict of the jury; (2) should a new trial be granted because of inconsistent statements of complaining witnesses in the complaint and at the time of trial; and (3) should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice?

Sufficiency of Evidence.

The applicable law, on appeal, to test...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases