There is no claim of affirmative dishonesty or malfeasance on the part of respondent. However, the facts establish that respondent was unduly neglectful of his responsibilities as an attorney at law to four of his clients.
This negligence and procrastination of respondent represented misconduct as defined by Section 5(a) of Rule XVIII and Section 1 of Rule XIX of the Rules of Practice of this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
