Judgment affirmed.
While there may have been technical error with respect to testimony at the trial concerning a brief, minor admission by defendant which was not adduced at the pretrial Huntley hearing on the admissibility of his full oral and written confession, we find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the error was not materially prejudicial and could not have affected the result (Code Crim. Pro., § 542; cf. Chapman v. California,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.