1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 165 S.E.2d
  5. 165 S.E.2d 686 (1969)
 

GILLIAM v. RUFFIN

No. 6918SC30.

165 S.E.2d 686 (1969)

4 N.C. App. 85

Charles W. GILLIAM and wife, Hettie P. Gilliam v. Bruce RUFFIN and wife, Pauline J. Ruffin; Charles Ruffin and wife, Jo Ann B. Ruffin; Ruffin & Ruffin Realty & Construction, Inc., a corporation; and R. G. Hancock and wife, Cora E. Hancock.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 26, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Clark, Greensboro, for plaintiffs appellees.

Hoyle, Boone, Dees & Johnson by J. Sam Johnson, Jr., Greensboro, for defendants Hancock appellants.

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs had no authority to amend their complaint in this case so as to again make the Hancocks necessary parties. We find no statute under these circumstances giving them such authority. The order of Judge Crissman of 15 March 1968 does not give them such authority. The order of Judge Exum dated 26 July 1968, to which the plaintiffs did not except, specifically denies their motion of 20 July 1968 to be permitted to amend. Plaintiffs have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases