Order affirmed.
In our view, defendant was not entitled to a hearing on his claim that he was denied a fair trial because he did not fully understand English and did not have the services of an official interpreter who could sit by his side and translate the entire proceedings. There is presently no legal requirement that an interpreter must sit with a defendant who is unfamiliar with the English language and consult with him throughout the entire trial. With respect...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
