UNITED STATES of America
v.
The GLOBE CHEMICAL CO., Inc., the Herbert Chemical Company, Foremost-McKesson, Inc., Calvert Chemical Co., Chemicals, Inc.—U. S. A., Joseph B. Engelhardt, Individually, and James R. Harrington, Individually.
United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 4, 1969.
On Motion to Dismiss for Undue Preindictment Delay October 10, 1969.
On Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Set Forth Facts Constituting Offense October 28, 1969.
On Motion to Dismiss Indictment October 29, 1969.
On Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Immunity from Prosecution November 4, 1969.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Edwin M. Zimmerman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Baddia J. Rashid, Carl J. Steinhouse; Dwight D. Moore, Joseph J. Calbert, John A. Weedon, Robert A. McNew, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division, Cleveland, Ohio, Robert M. Draper, U. S. Atty., S.D. Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, Thomas R. Smith and Robert A. Steinberg, Asst. U. S. Attys., Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff The United States.
J. Wallace Adair, Howrey, Simon, Baker & Murchison, Washington, D. C., Robert G. Stachler, Taft, Stetinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant The Globe Chemical Co. Inc.
Irving Harris, Cors, Hair & Hartsock, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants The Herbert Chemical Co. and James R. Harrington.
Daniel A. Rezneck, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D. C., Powell McHenry, Thomas S. Calder, Lawrence R. Elleman, Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates & Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant Foremost-McKesson, Inc.
Steven F. Williams, Nelson Schwab, Jr., Graydon, Head & Ritchey, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant Calvert Chemical Co.
Samuel M. Allen, Strauss, Troy & Ruehlmann, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant Chemicals, Inc.—U.S.A.
Murray S. Monroe, L. Clifford Craig, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant Joseph B. Engelhardt.
United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.
On Motion of Globe Chemical Co., Inc., to Dismiss Indictment October 29, 1969.
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
PORTER, District Judge.
The defendants have filed what they have denominated a "Motion to Inspect Certain Records and to Examine Certain Witnesses in Connection with the Selection of Grand Juries and Proceedings before Grand Juries and to Set Aside the Order Impounding Documents." This has been thoroughly briefed and was the subject of oral...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
