1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 254 Md.
  5. 254 Md. 592 (1969)
 

HALE v. CRAMER

[No. 363, September Term, 1968.]

254 Md. 592 (1969)

255 A.2d 37

HALE, ET VIR v. CRAMER, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 8, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas N. Sharretts and Louis Peregoff, with whom was Edward J. Birrane, Jr. on the brief, for appellants.

L. Robert Evans, with whom were Samuel A. Green, Jr., Robert H. Archer, and Henry C. Engel on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is an extension of Palmisano v. Baltimore County, 249 Md. 94, 238 A.2d 251 (1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 853, 89 S.Ct. 93, 21 L.Ed.2d 123 (1968), in which case Judge Finan for this Court in the opening paragraph of the opinion said:

"When an adoption proceeding lengthens into prolonged litigation, when such litigation finds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases