1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 24 N.Y.2d
  5. 24 N.Y.2d 811 (1969)
 

HUDSON v. BROOKFIELD CONSTR. CO., INC.

24 N.Y.2d 811 (1969)

George D. Hudson, Appellant, v. Brookfield Construction Company, Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 9, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George D. Hudson, pro se, for appellant.

Vincent T. Aiello and Frank J. Amabile for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN and JASEN. Judges BURKE, KEATING and BREITEL dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum: Plaintiff's work was not concerned with the use or correction of the hazardous condition which caused the accident. Hence, the rule of the Kowalsky case (264 N.Y. 125) is not applicable. There was, therefore, an issue of fact to submit to the jury.

Order affirmed, without costs (Kowalsky v. Conreco Co., 264 N.Y. 125; Senkbeil v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 18 N.Y.2d 789, affg. 23 A.D.2d 587, 589...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases