ATTORNEY GENERAL EX REL. OPTOMETRY BOARD OF EXAMINERS v. PETERSON

Calendar No. 2, Docket Nos. 51,662, 51,663.

381 Mich. 445 (1969)

164 N.W.2d 43

ATTORNEY GENERAL, ex rel. OPTOMETRY BOARD OF EXAMINERS, v. PETERSON. SAME v. SMEELINK.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided February 3, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Joseph B. Bilitzke and Maurice M. Moule, Assistant Attorneys General, for the plaintiff.

Woodrow A. Yared, for defendants Peterson and Sattler.

Wierenga & Sevensma, for defendants Smeelink and Smeelink Optical Service, Inc.


ADAMS, J. (dissenting).

On September 28, 1962 the attorney general filed bills of complaint in these consolidated cases alleging that defendants, opticians, "did wrongfully and unlawfully practice the profession of optometry * * * in that they did diagnose, examine and measure the eyes of certain persons for contact lenses, and did fit, insert, and adjust the said contact lenses to the eyes of these said persons." The bills were amended to allege the acts constituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases