This proceeding, in review of a Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board award, is one of a series of cases relating to the "double recovery" provision found in section 249(2) of the Charter of the City of Oakland. (See Act 5557, Deering's General Laws, Uncodified; City of Oakland v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (Reimers)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CITY OF OAKLAND v. WORKMEN'S COMP. APP. BD.
Docket No. 25873.
271 Cal.App.2d 555 (1969)
76 Cal. Rptr. 886
CITY OF OAKLAND, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, MARYON BERNARDINI et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 8, 1969.
April 8, 1969.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Edward A. Goggin, City Attorney, and George M. Cahalan, Assistant City Attorney, for Petitioner.
Everett A. Corton, Richard E. Ryan, Caroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough and Philip Paul Bowe for Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
