32 A.D.2d 792 (1969)

Beatrice James-Smith, Appellant, v. Meshulem Rottenberg, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 9, 1969

Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Respondent's answer, which was served on June 14, 1966, contained general denials. By notice of motion dated August 30, 1968 he moved to amend his answer by setting forth the affirmative defenses of fraud and illegality. At this time the case had reached the top of the Trial Calendar. Appellant's case was prepared on the basis of an answer containing a general denial; she is old and in ill health and all the facts which might form the basis of the affirmative defenses occurred prior to the making of the contract and were or should have been known to respondent at least by the time the complaint was served. Although we are mindful of the liberal policy to be followed with respect to motions to amend (see CPLR 3025, subd. [b]), we are of the opinion that it was an improvident exercise of discretion, resulting in prejudice to appellant, to permit the amendment.


1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases